Post by account_disabled on Jan 9, 2024 22:16:05 GMT -5
and Google was therefore forced to clarify in court the reason for the penalties). An important part of Google's job of providing valuable results to users is protecting the integrity of those results from those who seek to manipulate them for their own use. As noted, efforts to subvert or mock the process by which search engines rank a site's relevance is called “webspam” within the search industry. Such search engine manipulation harms what is most important to users: the quality (i.e. relevance) of our results. What is manipulation (criminalised), and what is not Let's face it: SEO consists precisely in manipulating - in a good way, hopefully - Google results for one's own use.
Then there are those SEOs who say that it is t Google's results are better, or that in Malaysia Phone Number List any case the work of many SEOs has pushed Google to greatly impersuade the quality of the SERPs over the years. And this, at least in part, is true. The point is that Google constantly finds itself in the embarrassment of extending one hand to SEOs, while with the other it is ready to thrash them: on the one hand it publishes its official guide to SEO , which explains how this practice is useful for "obtaining a significant impact on the user's experience of use and on the performance in the organic results of the engine" , while on the other hand it must continually clarify the boundaries within which an SEO can operate (first of all, probably, that of avoiding the buying and selling of links or in any case the so-called " link schemes "). If you still have doubts
about what Google wants and above all does NOT want, I advise you to re-read its well-known " Instructions for Webmasters ", where it is explained in detail how to help the search engine find and "understand" the your contents, following (obviously) its rules. Even more useful in my opinion are the guidelines for quality raters , which help to better understand how Google's "human evaluators" judge your site, and therefore how the search engine wants the content you publish on the web to be. Conclusion I close by trying to answer the question that is the subject of this post again: is SEO manipulation? In my opinion it is precisely the word "manipulation" that sounds bad in our language. In the various dictionaries we read that the term means (among other things) machination, deception, conditioning or control operation (for example, of consciences) or modification or alteration (for example, genetics). In short, it is very similar to the term " to cheat ".
Then there are those SEOs who say that it is t Google's results are better, or that in Malaysia Phone Number List any case the work of many SEOs has pushed Google to greatly impersuade the quality of the SERPs over the years. And this, at least in part, is true. The point is that Google constantly finds itself in the embarrassment of extending one hand to SEOs, while with the other it is ready to thrash them: on the one hand it publishes its official guide to SEO , which explains how this practice is useful for "obtaining a significant impact on the user's experience of use and on the performance in the organic results of the engine" , while on the other hand it must continually clarify the boundaries within which an SEO can operate (first of all, probably, that of avoiding the buying and selling of links or in any case the so-called " link schemes "). If you still have doubts
about what Google wants and above all does NOT want, I advise you to re-read its well-known " Instructions for Webmasters ", where it is explained in detail how to help the search engine find and "understand" the your contents, following (obviously) its rules. Even more useful in my opinion are the guidelines for quality raters , which help to better understand how Google's "human evaluators" judge your site, and therefore how the search engine wants the content you publish on the web to be. Conclusion I close by trying to answer the question that is the subject of this post again: is SEO manipulation? In my opinion it is precisely the word "manipulation" that sounds bad in our language. In the various dictionaries we read that the term means (among other things) machination, deception, conditioning or control operation (for example, of consciences) or modification or alteration (for example, genetics). In short, it is very similar to the term " to cheat ".